For decades now, liberals have been preaching to us the
“science” behind “global warming”—I mean “climate change”—I mean “global
climate disruption.” (It’s hard to keep up. Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
has had almost as many labels as Al Gore has private jets!) “The science is
settled,” we’ve been told. Those of us who doubt are branded with numerous
labels as well: “deniers,” “flat-earthers,” “anti-science,” “know-nothings,” and
so on.
The name-calling is even worse when it comes to “deniers” of
Darwinian evolution (D.E.). Here, the ridicule is truly rampant. Of course,
this is to be expected when it comes to the holiest of all liberal doctrines—the
guiding philosophy of their prevailing worldview. (Nothing gets a liberal more worked
up than a creationist!)
It is quite unsurprising, then, that liberals have united
behind both the “science” of AGW and D.E. The worldview behind D.E. in almost
every way agrees with those who have turned their eyes toward “Mother
Earth”—worshipping and serving “created things rather than the Creator.”
After all, D.E. teaches that, since all life sprang from the
same single-celled source, all living things are related. Darwinian
evolutionists see humans, along with all other living things, strictly as a
product of nature and natural processes. Therefore, to see humans on equal
footing with all other life and owing our very existence to the earth are very
logical conclusions for such a philosophy. Thus, the earth-worshipping
environmentalist is almost always a Darwinist, as well.
As much as liberals disparage religion, especially
Christianity, how ironic it is that D.E. and AGW inspire such a religious-like
following. Eminent geologist, Ian Plimer, a Professor in the School of Earth
and Environmental Sciences (University
of Adelaide), Emeritus Professor in
the School of Earth
Sciences (University
of Melbourne), and ardent
atheist, is also a vehement opponent of AGW.
Plimer calls AGW “the new religion of First
World urban elites,” adding that “Environmentalism has many of the
hallmarks of failed European socialism and Western (failed) Christianity. It
has a holy book which few have read (IPCC reports), has prophets (Gore) who
cannot be challenged, relies on dogma, ignores contrary evidence, has armies of
wide-eyed missionaries...; imposes guilt, has a catastrophist view of the
planet, and seeks indulgences.”
D.E. also has many of the marks of religion. Evolutionists,
themselves, admit as much. Dr. Michael Ruse, a philosopher of biology at Florida State
University, previously a philosopher
of science, especially evolutionary science, at the University
of Guelph in Ontario, has authored several books on
Darwinism and evolutionary theory. Ruse,
also an atheist, regularly debates, and has testified in federal court, in
support of D.E. In a May, 2000 article in the National Post he wrote,
“Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science.
Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion—a full-fledged
alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. . . . Evolution is a
religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of
evolution still today.”
Leave it to atheists to recognize a religion when they see
one!
Darwinian evolution attempts to explain the past. Global
warming alarmists speculate about the future. But what about the science of the
here-and-now? Surely those who hold themselves up as “champions for science”
would not ignore what they can see with their own eyes and hear with their own
ears. Surely someone so reliant on and trusting of what “science” reveals to us
would not allow himself to be led astray by elegant language, foolish logic,
and downright propaganda.
Oh, but they have—for as zealously as liberals believe in
AGW and D.E., they also passionately support the “right” of a woman to end the
life of her unborn child and are enthusiastically behind the homosexual agenda.
Life in the womb for a child is as well documented as
anything in science. With ultrasound and Doppler machines, as well as other
technology, one can monitor the life of a baby in the womb from very near the
beginning until birth.
Moments after conception (hardly a serious biologist in the
world would argue that life does not begin at conception), the resulting single
cell contains all 46 chromosomes necessary to grow into an adult human being.
Within 48 hours of conception, the mother’s body starts producing a hormone to
let her know that she is pregnant. In the beginning of the third week, the baby’s
heart begins to beat with a blood type that is often different from its
mother’s.
During week five, eyes, legs, and hands have begun to
develop. By week six, brain waves are detectable. Week eight, has every organ
in place, bones begin to replace cartilage, and the baby can begin to hear. By week 12, the baby is nearing the end of the first
trimester. She has all the necessary parts to experience pain, including her
nerves, spinal cord, and thalamus. She can grasp objects placed in her hand and
has fingerprints, a skeletal structure, and circulation.
By week 15, she has an adult’s
taste buds. Week 20, the earliest stage at which partial-birth abortion is performed,
the child can recognize her mother’s voice. She is within one or two weeks of
the stage where babies can routinely be saved outside the womb.
Yet, in spite of all that science
clearly reveals here, for decades now, liberals, driven by their (usually)
godless philosophy of Darwinian evolution, have denied or ignored the science
of the human womb. In the name of money—Planned Parenthood is a billion
dollar-plus industry, not to mention the other capitalistic forces that profit
from abortion—and sexual “freedom,” liberals have placed their wallets and
their libidos above science and morality.
Speaking of a liberal’s libido, real science does no favors
for the homosexual movement either.
As White House
Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett recently learned, even well established liberals
can draw the ire of the homosexual community by simply implying that homosexuality
is not innate (meaning genetic), but is rather a “lifestyle choice.” (Of course,
Jarrett quickly back-tracked and apologized.) We’ve been told for nearly 20
years now that homosexuality is a genetic and unchangeable behavior—that people
are born gay.
In 1993, when the journal Science published a study by Dean Hamer (et al) which strongly
suggested there was a gene for homosexuality, an eager and complicit media
celebrated. National Public Radio trumpeted the
findings. Newsweek’s cover asked, “Gay Gene?” The Wall Street Journal
announced, “Research Points Toward a Gay Gene…” The New York Times
noted, “Report Suggests Homosexuality Is Linked to Genes.”
Today, it is commonplace for
liberals in the media, Hollywood,
and like-minded politicians again to ignore the real science and continue to
perpetuate the falsehood that homosexuality is strictly genetic.
Dr. Satinover notes that, “The
notion that ‘homosexuals’ are in effect a ‘different species’ (different genes)
is ludicrous beyond belief. There is not the slightest evidence for that as
anyone who actually reads the studies (not reports on the studies) knows.” What science does reveal is that homosexuality
is a rather unhealthy and quite dangerous lifestyle.
According
to the CDC, gay and bisexual men account for more than 60 percent of all
syphilis cases, and more than 82 percent of all known sexually-transmitted AIDS
cases in 2006 were the result of male-to-male sexual contact. During its 2010
National STD Prevention Conference, the
CDC revealed
that the rate of new HIV diagnoses among men who have sex with men (MSM) is
more than 44 times that of other men and more than 40 times that of women.
Also, the rate of primary and secondary syphilis among MSM is more than 46
times that of other men and more than 71 times that of women.
According to Kevin Fenton, M.D., director of the CDC's
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, “While
the heavy toll of HIV and syphilis among gay and bisexual men has been long
recognized, this analysis shows just how stark the health disparities are
between this and other populations.” Just weeks ago, a
CDC study
revealed that 1 in 5 gay men in
U.S.
cities has HIV.
All of this, and I haven’t even mentioned the shaky science
that is behind AGW and D.E.! So, the next time you hear or read of someone
holding up liberalism as a bastion of science and reason, remember it is their
side that is blinded by ideology and their “religion.” Perhaps even point out
some of the “inconvenient truths” mentioned above.
