Our Books

If you enjoy this site, please consider purchasing one of our books (as low as $2.99). Click here to visit our Amazon page.

Our Books

Our Books
Books by Trevor Grant Thomas and Michelle Fitzpatrick Thomas

E-Mail Me:

NOTE: MY EMAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED! Trevor's new email address: trevorgrantthomas@gmail.com

Latest News/Commentary

Latest News/Commentary:

News/Commentary Archives:

News/Commentary Archives (for the current year; links to previous years archives at the bottom of each page)---PLUS: Trevor's Columns Archived (page linked at the bottom of the table below):

Saturday, September 20, 2014

How the NFL Should Fight Domestic Violence

I almost feel sorry for the NFL. You know things are not going your way when the Feminazis feel as if they can give advice on how your league should be run, and with the 2014 season barely underway, you’ve already become a topic on The View. I suppose things could get worse: NFL commissioner Roger Goodell could decide to outlaw tackling.

I’ve been a fan of football and the NFL since I was old enough to spell “Cowboys.” I remember once in elementary school, during an art class, we were supposed to draw what we wanted to be when we grew up. My little hands were not skilled enough to draw men in football uniforms, so I had the bright idea of diagramming plays. That’s right, somewhere around the third grade, my idea of high art was a page full of x’s and o’s accompanied by plenty of lines and arrows.

Along with being a fan of the NFL—and football in general—I’m an even bigger fan of the family. After coaching middle school and high school football for five years in the mid-1990s, I met my wife Michelle. I knew then that those long Sunday afternoons and evenings spent cooped up with a bunch of other men trying to decide things like whether our guards were quick enough to pull and pick up the opponent’s defensive end, were not for me.

After nearly 17 years of marriage (as I’ve noted before), Michelle and I are the parents of four children, including three boys. None of my boys yet play football (karate is their current sport of choice—for my girl as well!), and I’m not sure that they ever will. One thing I am sure of, unlike Ray Rice, Adrian Peterson, most of Adrian Peterson’s half-dozen children, and far too many others like them, our children are being raised in a home by a mother and father who are married and committed to marriage.

As Jack Cashill has already pointed out, both Rice and Peterson lacked such a home. And as has often been chronicled, they are far from alone. What’s more, to borrow from Mr. Cashill, as most sentient beings are aware, this is especially true among American blacks. If the NFL really wanted to hit hard against domestic violence, it would not seek the advice and counsel of liberals but would look to (biblical) marriage.

When it comes to domestic violence, there is hardly a situation more dangerous for women or children than when mom and dad (or step-dad or boyfriend) are merely “shacking up.” As was noted years ago, and as Forbes Magazine just recently alluded to, it is far more dangerous for a child to be reared in a home without his or her married biological parents than otherwise.

According to a 2010 federal study, children living with their mother and her boyfriend are about 11 times more likely to be sexually, physically, or emotionally abused than children living with their married biological parents. Additionally, children living with their mother and her boyfriend are six times more likely to be physically, emotionally, or educationally neglected than children living with their married biological parents.

In other words, as W. Bradford Wilcox put it, “one of the most dangerous places for a child in America to find himself is in a home that includes an unrelated male boyfriend — especially when that boyfriend is left to care for a child by himself.”

Likewise, shacking up is much more dangerous for women than is marriage. Compared to married women, women who cohabitate are three times more likely to experience physical aggression and nine times more likely to be murdered. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, never-married mothers are more than twice as likely to suffer domestic violence.

Thus, as anyone who really wants to can see, the real issue when it comes to domestic violence is not the NFL (domestic violence rates are much lower among NFL players than in the general population), but a breakdown of the traditional family. Whether we’re talking about the NFL, kids’ karate, or the myth of man-made global warming, this has been clear for years. Of course the liberal-led media would rather bash the made-for-men-only NFL than surrender one of the tenets of liberalism—that the traditional family doesn’t matter.

I said at the beginning of this that I “almost feel sorry for the NFL.” This is because the NFL is a privately held organization that is responsible for one of the most popular forms of entertainment in the world and can do pretty much whatever it wants when it comes to things like domestic violence among a few of its members. Yet, what does the NFL choose to do? It uses the “playbook” written by the National Organization for Women.

This is in addition to the NFL bending over backwards (sorry!) to accommodate the homosexual agenda. Somebody needs to tell Roger Goodell that liberalism is no friend of football—especially professional football. Like almost everything else concerning liberals, this matter is a means to a political end. Make no mistake about it, the left will attempt to use this moment to increase the power and influence of liberalism.

After a night of heavy drinking by both Ray Rice and his then fiancĂ©e Janay Palmer, when Rice later knocked out his soon-to-be-wife in an elevator, reportedly, soon afterward both Rice and Palmer became born-again Christians. The now married couple were both baptized in March and are receiving “religious mentoring” (read: Christian counseling) from other married couples, including NFL players and their wives.

This is the kind of solution to domestic violence that the NFL should openly embrace and support, as it is the only way that real change can occur. There’s no reason that the most popular sport in the country can’t take such steps. In fact, it would probably increase league popularity. Whether owners and league officials decide to take such steps or not, the players and coaches who know the real solutions in such matters (and there are plenty) need to lead the way.

(See this column on American Thinker.)

Copyright 2014, Trevor Grant Thomas
At the Intersection of Politics, Science, Faith, and Reason.
Trevor and his wife Michelle are the authors of: Debt Free Living in a Debt Filled World


  1. Trevor, the current sports scandal over domestic violence and other inappropriate behavior in the NFL is only a public distraction from the decision by Congress to start a new war. Diversion and manipulation of the American public is part of the strategy to keep us quiet and in line while the President and the establishment have their way.

    If you think back a few years, you may remember a similar scandal over doping in the professional baseball leagues. Timing of this prior event correlates very well with onset of the occupation phase of Gulf War II and allowed Congress a convenient distraction from the significant matter of missing WMD in Iraq.

    As it turned out, Congress was far more interested to investigate which baseball players were on drugs than to investigate where those supposed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were and if they were only a political lie issued by the Bush Administration to justify the war.

    March 20, 2003: Beginning of GW Bush's Gulf War II invasion of Iraq.

    Dec. 2003: Ten Baseball Players, including Barry Bonds, Called to Testify about BALCO. The investigation draws out for a couple of years. On Oct. 22, 2004, President Bush Signed Congressional legislation for the Anabolic Steroid Control Act.

    On March 17, 2005 many top players, including Canseco, Alex Rodriguez, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, and Curt Schilling were summoned to testify in front of Congress on the matter.

    What does the strategy accomplish? It gives the public an unavoidable distraction and diversion from the other significant issue, the WAR and it's proper justification. I only wish our Congress was as dedicated to eradicating lies and manipulation from our government as they have been to secure the credibility and integrity of our sports leagues.

  2. I'll agree it's a distraction, and if I were apart of this administration, I'd look for anything possible to distract from the myriad of disasters the Obama White House has wrought. This is especially the case with an election looming. As I alluded to, the Dems seem willing to use just about anything to get their sheeple into the voting stalls.

  3. You appear to be ignoring the fact the BALCO scandal (drug and steroid abuse in professional baseball) happened under GW Bush in similar geopolitical circumstances. Admit it, Obama and Bush are a matched set of manipulative neocon bookends.

    And now as Obama takes America back to a war we voted to stop in order to complete Bush's unfinished regime change agenda, that truth should be clear even to you.

    Part of me is relieved that Obama did what I predicted. If he had dallied further, I imagine the next fake hostage to be beheaded would be a Catholic nun from Canada. Speaking of hostages... where is Richard Simmons when you really need him?

  4. I have some some stupid things in my life, but I think the comment by Kiev here take the cake