Though Roger lost in the primary, his effect on the race was
significant. After his late entry into the race, much of the focus of the
debates and forums in which the three candidates (Roger, Doug Collins, and
Martha Zoller) participated centered around the Constitution.
Never has a focus on our Constitution been more necessary
and appropriate. Several recent events highlight this.
First of all, there is Boston
mayor Thomas Menino. Practicing his version of “tolerance” and completely
ignoring the First Amendment, Menino
threatened Chick-fil-A after its president Dan Cathy declared his support
for traditional (biblical) marriage. The threat wasn’t personal. Menino stated
that, “If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult—unless they
open up their policies.” What’s more, Menino also penned
a letter to Cathy, urging him to forego plans to open a restaurant in Boston . “There is no place
for discrimination along Boston 's
Freedom Trail and no place for your company alongside it,” he wrote.
Not recognizing the hypocrisy and Constitutional disregard, Mayor
of Chicago Rahm Emanuel, along with a Chicago Alderman, doubled
down on Menino’s threats. Alderman Proco Joe Moreno stated that due to
Cathy’s comments, he would not allow Chick-fil-A to open a location in his
ward. Emanuel backed up Moreno by announcing that
“Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago
values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors and our family
members. And if you’re gonna be part of the Chicago
community, you should reflect Chicago
values.”
Completing the “tolerance trio” was San Francisco Mayor Ed
Lee. Lee tweeted “Closest #ChickFilA
to San Francisco
is 40 miles away & I strongly recommend that they not try to come any
closer.”
Then there’s
Senator Harry Reid. Last week, in
an interview with the eagerly complicit Huffington Post, Reid claimed that
about a month earlier, a Bain investor called him and told him that Romney
didn’t pay any taxes for 10 years, and that was the reason behind Romney’s
refusal to release further tax returns.
Reid shamelessly added that, “You guys have said his wealth is $250 million—Not a chance in the world. It's a lot more than that. I mean, you do pretty well if you don't pay taxes for 10 years when you're making millions and millions of dollars.”
A couple of days
later, Reid took his accusations to the Senate floor. There he boldly declared
that, “the word is out that [Romney] hasn't paid any taxes for 10 years.
Let him prove that he has paid taxes, because he hasn't. We already know that
from one partial tax return that he gave us, he has money hidden in Bermuda,
the Cayman Islands and a Swiss bank account.”
In other words, the presumption of innocence and due process be damned; “Dingy Harry” put the accusation out there,
and now it is up to Romney to prove it isn’t true.
Now we have
another wicked maniac with a gun, killing innocent Americans. After the
shootings at the Sikh temple on Sunday in Wisconsin, liberal pundit Jay Bookman
of the Atlanta-Journal Constitution declared
that, “the tragedy in the Wisconsin case is compounded by the fact
that its victims were gathering in a place of peaceful worship, and were
apparently targeted because of their faith...Hate crimes that target groups
have a much longer list of victims than do acts of blind, random violence such
as that in Aurora.”
Bookman concluded that, “the Wisconsin
shooting should serve as a caution to those in public life who stoop to
targeting religious or ethnic groups in their irresponsible rhetoric, and who
by doing so validate the anger, fear and resentment that apparently motivated
this tragedy.”
Of course the
implication here is that the shootings in Wisconsin
are more tragic than those in Colorado because
the Wisconsin gunman was acting out of “hate”
(another term liberals have hijacked and turned into a “snarl-word”).
Also, another implication, just as Obama made after the Gabby Giffords
shootings, is that we (conservatives) need to tone down our “dangerous”
rhetoric.
It is this kind
of thinking that led to “hate-crime” legislation, which is nothing more than
criminalizing thought and speech. What a dangerous slope this places us on,
because, of course, many liberals would love nothing more than to criminalize words such as those spoken by Chick-fil-A
president Dan Cathy.
All too often,
today’s liberals are engaging in willful ignorance or blatant disregard when it
comes to our founding documents. I’m not just talking about your
run-of-the-mill liberal neighbor with his “Hope and Change” bumper sticker, or
even prominent liberal talking heads. When we have the highest ranking democrat
in Congress, and a Mayor who was formerly the U.S. President’s Chief of Staff,
along with other leading liberal politicians, so blinded by their “progressive”
political agenda that the U.S. Constitution is an after-thought, where are we
as a nation headed?!
Yet, no matter
such egregious Constitutional errors, come November at least 40% of Americans
will vote for the party behind this nonsense. There’s no way around it: America
needs a constitutional revival (along with a spiritual one).
Copyright 2012, Trevor Grant Thomas
At the Intersection of Politics, Science, Faith, and Reason.Trevor and his wife Michelle are the authors of: Debt Free Living in a Debt Filled World
tthomas@trevorgrantthomas.com
Hard not to get discouraged with the politics these days. I want you to blog about Romney's choice of VP candidate! :) What do you think!?
ReplyDeleteSorry! I just saw this! (I'm supposed to get notified when people comment!) (I did put some stuff on my FaceBook page after the pick.)
DeleteIn short, I like the Ryan pick. I think it was bold and good for the GOP along with being good for Romney. Ryan is articulate and very likeable. I look forward to his speech tonight.
It's okay, Trevor! I like him too.
Delete