More Tragic Results of Progressive ‘Values’
Trevor Thomas
January 28, 2011
The only real hope for any
of us lies not in a political philosophy. However, good government is a
significant part of the fiber of any great nation. Thomas Jefferson said, “The care of human life and happiness and
not their destruction is the only legitimate object of good government.” Given
that
For a most horrific
snapshot of where we are, we must look no further than
Though not receiving the coverage of the Loughner tragedy, as it was not to the liking of much of the liberal media, news of Gosnell’s butchery garnered much shock and disgust. Yet, in the shadow of Roe v. Wade and the culture of death that it wrought, as Kevin McCullough concludes, it is no surprise that there is a Dr. Gosnell among us.
Despite much effort to the
contrary, for nearly four decades progressivism has lulled far too many
Americans into complacency when it comes to life in the womb. For nearly four
decades, despite more and more sound science to the contrary, Americans have
been told that a fetus is a not a person and is undeserving of the same
protections as the rest of us. The left is littered with politicians, all the
way up to and including
Hoping for
Of course, with abortion being a lynchpin of progressivism, many leading liberals are taking a very measured tone when it comes to this tragedy. Towing the classic liberal line, writing for Salon.com, Rebekah Kuschmider notes that in such matters, “We need to start with sex. People have sex. You may wish they wouldn't and many preach that, without benefit of marriage, people shouldn't, but people have sex… And you do not have the right to impose your personal sexual morals on anyone else. You don't. It's rude. So please don't try.”
Paving the way for legalized abortion-on-demand, pornography, homosexual marriage, and so on was—again, courtesy of progressivism—the “sexual revolution.” Thus, not only have we abandoned nearly all reason and morality when it comes to life in the womb, but many Americans have also been deceived into believing that nearly any sexual act to which we are tempted is healthy, normal, and without dire consequences.
Therefore, along with Gosnell, we also have MTV. With its infamous new series “Skins,” the number one peddler of youth entertainment poison set the entertainment world abuzz. Citing its “foul language, illegal drug use, illegal activity as well as thoroughly pervasive sexual content,” the Parents Television Council called “Skins” the “most dangerous program that has ever been foisted on your children.”
With actors as young as 15, there has been much discussion about whether the show has actually engaged in child pornography. As even the New York Times suggested, when you come into work and there is a meeting centering on whether you’ve crossed the line into child pornography, you’re probably in the wrong job.
What was that about
imposing “your personal sexual morals?” Whose sexual
“morals” do you prefer, MTV’s or the Southern Baptists’?
As I hinted at the
beginning, it will take more than a shift in political philosophies for
Trevor Grant Thomas
At the Intersection of Politics, Science, Faith, and Reason.
Copyright 2011